SI Selection & SOW Review
You've signed with Workday. The next decision — which partner builds it, and on what terms — sets your cost, risk, and leverage for the entire program. This fixed-scope engagement ends with a partner you chose on evidence and a SOW that protects you.
- ◆Evaluation criteria and shortlist built around your scope, complexity, and internal capacity
- ◆Bids normalized so you compare like for like — scope, team seniority, assumptions, and what's excluded (data conversion, integrations, post-production support)
- ◆Timeline realism tested, so the shortest proposal doesn't win just for being the shortest
- ◆Structured scoring of SI proposals and orals — approach, staffing, references, and realism
- ◆Pitch team = delivery team: the senior consultants you meet in orals are named in the SOW, with continuity and replacement terms
- ◆For Workday Launch: a configured-scope inventory written into the SOW, so "fixed scope" means something you can verify
- ◆Line-by-line SOW review: scope, assumptions, deliverables, exclusions, and change-order exposure
- ◆Staffing commitments: delivery-team mix and onshore/offshore balance
- ◆Testing responsibilities spelled out: who designs scenarios, who supplies test data, who executes, who triages defects, and how fast the SI must fix them
- ◆Acceptance criteria for each phase, written into the SOW before work starts
- ◆Payment milestones tied to accepted work, not elapsed time
- ◆An honest read on your own readiness: internal capacity, decision-makers, data, and change readiness
- ◆A client-side governance model ready for Plan: steering cadence, decision rights, and escalation
- ◆A negotiation brief for your sponsor and procurement team
You've signed with Workday — or are about to — and you're choosing an implementation partner, or you have a draft SOW on the table and want an independent read before you sign.
